X-Authentication-Warning: new-smtp1.ihug.com.au: Host p290-tnt1.syd.ihug.com.au [203.173.129.36] claimed to be acceleron
Message-ID: <027901c14275$211621f0$0a02a8c0@acceleron>
From: "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To: <laszlo DOT molnar AT eth DOT ericsson DOT se>, <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
References: <20010912123128 DOT Q3069 AT libra DOT eth DOT ericsson DOT se>
Subject: Re: Win2k + djgpp
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 18:12:16 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Guys,

I just spotted that I have an ancient version of Perl 5.004_02 available for
people to use on Win 2K. I will download the perl561s.zip from Simtel
tonight and re-build it over the weekend. If all goes well please check the
unofficial DJGPP & Win2K page for the updated binary package.

Andrew
----- Original Message -----
From: "Laszlo Molnar" <laszlo DOT molnar AT eth DOT ericsson DOT se>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 8:31 PM
Subject: Re: Win2k + djgpp


> On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 07:14:33PM +0200, Tim Van Holder wrote:
> [..]
> > Laszlo, how stable is 5.7.2?  It might be useful to make a release
>
> 5.7.2 is a development version. 5.8.0 will be the next stable version.
>
> > of 5.6.1 would be fine too, provided the DSM lists it as 5.6.1b or
> > something).
>
> Ok, maybe I'll have some time in the weekend and prepare a new binary
> release of 5.6.1. But what name should I use for the package (instead
> of perl561b.zip)?
>
> Laszlo
>