Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 08:40:46 +0300 (WET)
From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
X-Sender: pavenis AT ieva06
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Preprocessor installation
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010903085302.16484B-100000@is>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.05.10109030839050.26288-100000@ieva06>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> 
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Andris Pavenis wrote:
> 
> > > Does "make install" in the GCC distribution install /usr/local/bin/cpp
> > > on Unix?  I found a few programs that rely on cpp being on PATH, and I
> > > wonder what do GNU/Linux users do when they install GCC 3.x.
> > 
> > Yes, it installs
> 
> Then perhaps we should, too.
> 
> Are there any problems with doing that, especially now that gcc doesn't 
> invoke cpp by default?
> 

It is already in (in gcc30b.zip and gcc301b.zip)