Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2001 20:09:30 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <7263-Sun02Sep2001200929+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
In-reply-to: <7458-Sun02Sep2001192026+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Subject: Re: edebug + gcc 3.0.1
References: <10109021524 DOT AA16476 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <7458-Sun02Sep2001192026+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2001 19:20:27 +0300
> From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
> 
> > If so, this means that all the inline asm could be broken unless reviewed?
> 
> No, a simple grep will do ;-)  (I am already doing it.)

I committed changes for a few files under djgpp/src that had similar
problems ("asm" without "volatile" in the middle of a C function).
Since one of the affected files is dpmiexcp.c, people who use the CVS
library to build their applications are well advised to do a "cvs up"
and then rebuild.