Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 15:07:52 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Andrew Cottrell <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
cc: Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com,
        wojciech DOT galazka AT polkomtel DOT com DOT pl
Subject: Re: ODP: Win2K/XP fixes - implementation review
In-Reply-To: <00c801c12fb4$0a9748b0$0a02a8c0@acceleron>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010828150635.3934B-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Andrew Cottrell wrote:

> I agree with all that has been said. It looks like we have the standard
> issue that you get from time to time:
>    Do we cleanup the code and ensure that it then becomes easier to maintain
> and expandable?
>     or
>    Do we release the code and fix it up while the end users are testing it
> for us and giving us vital info on bugs which have not been fixed?

IMHO, in general we should try to release a reasonably clean code, 
because we don't have too many opportunities to test it, and so cannot 
afford repeated testing.