Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:14:04 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
Message-Id: <1438-Fri24Aug2001151403+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3B8664C8.23360.DCAE88@localhost> (pavenis@lanet.lv)
Subject: Re: gcc-3.0.1 and Win2k
References: <3B865444 DOT 899 DOT 9C2B20 AT localhost> (pavenis AT lanet DOT lv) <3B8664C8 DOT 23360 DOT DCAE88 AT localhost>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:29:28 +0300
> > 
> > Can you tell what's wrong with using the change I suggested?
> 
> If some package needs specific linker script, it is best that it provides 
> script (Currently out CVS version needs it when not very new binutils 
> versions are being used). Relaying on name which is now used by 
> GCC is not safe.

That's why there's a fallback, djgpp.djl.

Anyway, we must solve this problem somehow.  The current situation is
IMHO unacceptable.