Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:05:42 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv Message-Id: <8011-Fri24Aug2001130541+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <3B8643C0.19077.5BA1DC@localhost> (pavenis@lanet.lv) Subject: Re: gcc-3.0.1 and Win2k References: (message from Andris Pavenis on Thu, 23 Aug 2001 20:30:48 +0300 (WET)) <3B8643C0 DOT 19077 DOT 5BA1DC AT localhost> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv > Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:08:32 +0300 > > Shouldn't it be more correct to use script from from the source tree: > DJGPP_DJL := $(shell pwd)/$(TOP)/../../lib/djgpp.djl I don't think so: that could mean a chicken-and-egg problem. For example, the script in the djlsr distribution might not work with the version of GCC used to build the library. Also, the above requires a pwd command, which might not be installed. We are trying to avoid requesting any additional packages beyond the absolute minimum. I think the best way is to use the script which comes with the compiler used to compile the library: it's guaranteed to work (if it doesn't, they don't have a working installation).