Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 20:37:31 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
Message-Id: <5137-Thu23Aug2001203730+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au
In-reply-to: <10108231721.AA17138@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu)
Subject: Re: gcc-3.0.1 and Win2k
References:  <10108231721 DOT AA17138 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 12:21:13 -0500 (CDT)
> 
> Now for the bad news - if I set lfn=n gcc does not work on XP, it just
> quietly exits.  Any ideas based on the output below?

It seems that the compiler stops before it invokes the assembler, but
it's hard to tell more.

I'd suggest to add --save-temps and see what files are left behind
when it exits.

FWIW, compiling with LFN=n on Windows 98 does seem to work, at least
for a short test source I tried (not assert.c).