From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 13:59:40 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: rhgdb and dwarf2 oddity
Message-ID: <3B83BACC.6705.A2BE59@localhost>
In-reply-to: <5137-Wed22Aug2001184244+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References: <3B837ED5 DOT 9470 DOT 9EB9A AT localhost> (snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com)
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> the debuggee.  If so, the equivalent sequence in GDB would be to let
> the program run to completion, then type "run" again.  This restarts
> the program with the same argv[] array as before, and the breakpoints
> you've set should still be valid.

I did this and gdb had no complaint.

> Perhaps a fixed release of Binutils could be available by the time
> GDB 5.1 is out.  (I estimate that will take at least another month.)

Sure.

Mark