From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10108211419.AA15543@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: gcc-3.0.1 and Win2k
To: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com (DJGPP developers)
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:19:45 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au (Andrew Cottrell), eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii)
In-Reply-To: <3B828D04.17331.E68F41@localhost> from "pavenis@lanet.lv" at Aug 21, 2001 04:32:04 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> It's for current CVS version. Perhaps it would be better to use modified
> v2.03 for release binaries.  Of course I can upload binaries built using
> todays CVS version of DJGPP (I already have them - see
> 	http://www.ltn.lv/~pavenis/gcctest.html)
> Perhaps in such case we should put them in "v2gnu/betas or
> vegnu/alphas quarantine" for some time and announce in djgpp 
> mailing list

I will create a patch kit for 2.03 as soon as possible.  I was hoping
I had another week.  The _creat* patches work, but Eli wanted to swap
the order and I have not had a chance to create tests for this, so
they haven't been committed.  I think I can back-patch everything
else very quickly.