Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 14:25:11 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv Message-Id: <9791-Fri17Aug2001142511+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <3B7D1C46.23448.59E465@localhost> (pavenis@lanet.lv) Subject: Re: _open.c commit? (was Re: Selector Exhaustion) References: <10108162209 DOT AA13700 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> (sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu) <3B7D1C46 DOT 23448 DOT 59E465 AT localhost> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv > Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 13:29:42 +0300 > > > > However, I'd like to see that patch changed so that plain DOS systems > > aren't affected at all. Why slow down systems which don't need that? > > We already have the _windows_major variable that can be used to easily > > test for whether we are on Windows, and _get_dos_version(1) can be > > used for NT/W2K/XP. > > Have You tried printf ("%d\n",_windows_major) at program startup? What for? I know that _windows_major is not initialized in the current CVS. > /* Compute the version Windows reports via Int 2Fh/AX=1600h. */ > ! static void __attribute__((constructor)) > get_windows_version(void) I'd prefer simply to call get_windows_version in the startup code (and rename it to __get_windows_version or something). But let's first wait to see if the change I suggested, which is reason for changing get_windows_version, is indeed accepted by others.