Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 15:51:58 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au Message-Id: <1858-Wed15Aug2001155157+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <00aa01c12584$34acb890$0a02a8c0@acceleron> (acottrel@ihug.com.au) Subject: Re: Fw: Fstat.c patch References: <00fe01c12311$92957890$0a02a8c0 AT acceleron> <4331-Mon13Aug2001125532+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <019701c123f9$6febae70$0a02a8c0 AT acceleron> <557-Mon13Aug2001165656+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <028c01c12405$d1b326e0$0a02a8c0 AT acceleron> <013d01c124bc$b4b1fe60$0a02a8c0 AT acceleron> <6480-Tue14Aug2001182649+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <00aa01c12584$34acb890$0a02a8c0 AT acceleron> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: "Andrew Cottrell" > Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 22:17:07 +1000 > > I started to use the osmajor function, but then I checked and osmajor is is > not always the true osmajor version as it calles _get_dos_version(0) not > get_dos_version(1), which means that osmajor can be changed by setver. I don't think we should worry about that: I doubt if anybody uses SETVER on Windows 2000. So I don't think we should issue another __dpmi_int to avoid SETVER's lies.