X-Authentication-Warning: new-smtp1.ihug.com.au: Host p280-tnt2.syd.ihug.com.au [203.173.131.26] claimed to be acceleron Message-ID: <00d801c124ac$90280040$0a02a8c0@acceleron> From: "Andrew Cottrell" To: , , References: <3B791F66 DOT 22654 DOT 6DAEEC AT localhost> Subject: Re: Selector Exhaustion Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 20:33:29 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com > > The issue I had was that Charles patch was for Win 2K and Andris patch was > > for Win 98. I wanted to have the same source and executables for both Win 98 > > and 2K. Between the patch from Charles that was for Win 2K issues and > > Andris and your comments about this last week I thought it best to only > > enable the code in Charles's patch on my Win 2K box and don't enable the > > function calls when running on my Win 98 box. I thought it was better safe > > than sorry. > > > > Here is patch that seems to work both under Win98SE and > WinNT 4.0+SP6 (with my test program). I added wrapper procedure > around original direct_exec_tail() as I think it's easier to debug if > needed. > > Cannot test on Win2k though. Thanks for merging the two changes. This should help me out as I still build code on the Win 98 box and then test it on the Win 2K box. It may take me a few days to test it. I will let you know how I go when I try it. Just spent the last hour reading and getting up to speed with the issues while I was at work.