Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 16:24:02 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au
Message-Id: <9628-Mon13Aug2001162401+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
In-reply-to: <018901c123f6$2b64fc50$0a02a8c0@acceleron> (acottrel@ihug.com.au)
Subject: Re: Windows 2000 patch for utime.c v1
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010808181731 DOT 27271C-100000 AT is> <007701c120c6$2d72db80$0a02a8c0 AT acceleron> <7458-Thu09Aug2001183844+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <00af01c12197$68628570$0a02a8c0 AT acceleron> <2561-Mon13Aug2001124204+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <018901c123f6$2b64fc50$0a02a8c0 AT acceleron>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 22:47:52 +1000
> 
> Overall looks like utime_2.dif is the correct patch to use as it allows
> directory times to be updated on Win2K.

Please post this utime_2.dif patch again.  I guess I got confused by
all those patches flying around ;-)