Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:42:04 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: "Andrew Cottrell" Message-Id: <2561-Mon13Aug2001124204+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu In-reply-to: <00af01c12197$68628570$0a02a8c0@acceleron> (acottrel@ihug.com.au) Subject: Re: Windows 2000 patch for utime.c v1 References: <007701c120c6$2d72db80$0a02a8c0 AT acceleron> <7458-Thu09Aug2001183844+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <00af01c12197$68628570$0a02a8c0 AT acceleron> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: "Andrew Cottrell" > Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 22:24:29 +1000 > > > > Btw, did they work on directories, i.e. could you change the time > > stamp of a directory? > Yes I could change the time stamp of a directory on Win 2K. So at least we gained something by switching to 7143h. > On Win 98 when I tested it I could not change the timestamp of a directory. Windows 9X (and DOS) don't allow to change the timestamp of a directory. Function 7143h silently does nothing for a directory on those systems, while functions of the 57xx family cannot be used on a directory because they require a file handle, and you cannot `open' a directory. > Should setting time on a directory fail? It should fail if the OS doesn't let us do that. So it should succeed on W2K and XP, but fail on other systems. If you build `touch' with the latest patch to `utime', do you see this behavior? > To save time again i have attached an updated utime.c patch that fails when > trying to set the time on a directory as occurs with the exisiting code on > Win 9x. Sorry, I don't understand: this code doesn't do anything special for directories. What change against the previous version of this code stopped the support for directories?