X-Authentication-Warning: kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 11:10:55 -0500
From: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Cc: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
Subject: Re: TIOCGWINSIZE idea
Message-ID: <20010809111055.C13224@kendall.sfbr.org>
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com,
	"Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
References: <3B7189D1 DOT 14369 DOT 5D0609 AT localhost>; <20010809080701 DOT A12765 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <3B7275B3 DOT 16653 DOT 507561 AT localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3B7275B3.16653.507561@localhost>; from snowball3@bigfoot.com on Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 11:36:19AM -0400
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

-: > It might be useful to check whether the djgpp port of PDcurses makes
-: > the same assumptions as does ncurses.
-: 
-: I have pdcurses 2.5 beta on a cdrw, and it doesn't use termios at all so I 
-: can't make a comparison.                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Interesting.
Is this good, bad, or just a different approach to curses?