From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 12:20:21 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: Test binaries of gcc-3.0.1 20010802 (prerelease)
Message-ID: <3B6A9705.32294.192A26@localhost>
In-reply-to: <200108031523.LAA31236@delorie.com>
References: <3B6AD5E9 DOT 23174 DOT 98E16A AT localhost> (pavenis AT lanet DOT lv)
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> There's another issue related to GCC 3.0: the register-naming scheme
> in the DWARF2 debug info.

Wasn't the register-naming scheme for all our debug formats broken until 
recently? If so, couldn't we use the dwarf2 scheme (the svr4_* array in 
gcc) for all debug formats.