Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 11:23:45 -0400
Message-Id: <200108031523.LAA31236@delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: eliz set sender to eliz AT delorie DOT com using -f
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
CC: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
In-reply-to: <3B6AD5E9.23174.98E16A@localhost> (pavenis@lanet.lv)
Subject: Re: Test binaries of gcc-3.0.1 20010802 (prerelease)
References:  <3B6AD5E9 DOT 23174 DOT 98E16A AT localhost>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
> Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 16:48:41 +0300
>
>	http://www.ltn.lv/~pavenis/gcctest.html
> 
> I built them using 2001/08/02 CVS version of DJGPP runtime library.

I still think that it's unwise to use the CVS version of the library
to produce the GCC port.  I posted the list of patches to libc.a v2.03
I think would benefit users on W2K.  (Now there's another patch to
crt0.S by Charles.)

There's another issue related to GCC 3.0: the register-naming scheme
in the DWARF2 debug info.  I'd be interested to hear your opinion; if
you think the current register names should not be changed, I'd like
to make a change in GDB before v5.1 is out (the pretest has just
started).