From: "Mark E." To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 14:02:44 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: ecma, bash 2.05, and termcap update Message-ID: <3B66BA84.23520.D5D79C@localhost> In-reply-to: <20010731115816.A871@kendall.sfbr.org> References: <3B6603C4 DOT 16280 DOT 90047D AT localhost>; from snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com on Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 01:03:00AM -0400 X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > I hadn't thought about this before, but why couldn't GNU termcap have > been ported to djgpp? The license. GNU Termcap is GPL'ed. That would force any DJGPP program that wants to use it to also become GPL'ed. The djgpp termcap license is LGPL which is . This means the programmer isn't forced to use the more restrictive license just to have a program that relies on termcap. Mark