From: "Juan Manuel Guerrero" <ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De>
Organization: Darmstadt University of Technology
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 11:05:35 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: gettext port
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.54DE)
Message-ID: <2E0980B03A1@HRZ1.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

I will upload today or tomorrow a port of gettext-0.10.39
but some questions arise:
1) Binaries compiled with NLS are large. Should the binary package
   contain binaries compiled _without_ NLS too? This means two binaries
   for every program. Example:
     xgettext.exe (compiled out-of-the-box with NLS) and
     nnxgettext.exe (no-NLS xgettext compiled _without_ NLS)
   This would be intended for people who need the binaries but are not interested
   in NLS for some particular reason. I have no preferences at all.
2) Packages like gettext and libiconv start installing html formated
   man pages and info docs into a new directory. Example:
     gettext.html, gettext.pdf, gettext.dvi, gettext.ps go into $(prefix)/doc/gettext
   This is incompatible with the way DJGPP docs packages install their files.
   They install into $(prefix)/gnudocs/gettext. I have fixed this so the files are
   installed into $(prefix)/gnudocs/gettext and _not_ into $(prefix)/doc/gettext.
   I have no preferences at all but I will send a patch to Bruno Haible to fix
   DJGPP specific things so I need to know what is prefered concerning the
   directory issue.

Reagrds,
Guerrero, Juan M.