Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 16:14:41 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: UPX in simtel packages
In-Reply-To: <200107291153.NAA00588@father.ludd.luth.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010729161401.3717A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 29 Jul 2001, Martin Str|mberg wrote:

> I note that the recently released sed is compressed with UPX. Do we
> really want this? I'm thinking of my poor 386 20MiHz. Should we punish
> old boxes like this?

Did you try to time a compressed Sed compared to uncompressed, on that 
machine?  If so, what were the results?