Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 12:24:58 -0400
Message-Id: <200107281624.MAA21784@delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: eliz set sender to eliz AT delorie DOT com using -f
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200107280927.FAA00574@delorie.com> (message from Eli Zaretskii
	     on Sat, 28 Jul 2001 05:27:22 -0400)
Subject: Re: Bug in COFF debug info
References:  <200107280927 DOT FAA00574 AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 05:27:22 -0400
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT delorie DOT com>
> 
> The same program I posted in the previous message seems to indicate
> that there's a discrepancy between the register numbering used by GCC
> and the one used by GDB (the latter is supposed to be derived from the
> x86 ABI, so it's probably GCC which is in error).

Sorry, false alarm: it turns out the problem is in GDB's mapping
between several different register-naming schemes.