From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 11:57:02 +0200
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Comments on GCC 3.0 distribution
Message-ID: <20010714115702.A264@lauras.lt>
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <200107140508 DOT HAA14176 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200107140508.HAA14176@father.ludd.luth.se>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> No. A symlink would have size 510 or 511 (I've forgotten which one). A

510

> size of 2048 means a DJGPP stub (the old way of simulating symlinks
> for executables).
> 
> You'd need to rebuild ln.

And everything else to make programs understand symlinks.

Laurynas