Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 23:37:16 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <4634-Wed11Jul2001233715+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <200107111714.TAA05783@father.ludd.luth.se> (message from Martin
	Str|mberg on Wed, 11 Jul 2001 19:14:29 +0200 (MET DST))
Subject: Re: DJDIR Windows 2000 investigation results #1
References:  <200107111714 DOT TAA05783 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 19:14:29 +0200 (MET DST)
> 
> According to Eli Zaretskii:
> > > From: "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
> > > The src/libc/dos/io/_*.c files seem to be inconsistent as some check the
> > > _osmajor version number if LFN is used and some don't.
> > 
> > Hmm... that's true.  Martin, do you remember why _open and _creatnew,
> > for example, use a different logic as far as OS versions are
> > concerned?
> 
> I think the thinking was LFNs supported -> FAT32 supported. Thus the code.

Then why does _creat_new only set the FAT32 bit if the DOS version is
7 or more, even in the LFN case?