Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 20:53:23 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
Message-Id: <7458-Mon09Jul2001205322+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3B49E60D.6857.303454@localhost> (pavenis@lanet.lv)
Subject: Re: Comments on GCC 3.0 distribution
References: <3B49D682 DOT 26047 DOT 1B0E2A AT localhost> <3B49E60D DOT 6857 DOT 303454 AT localhost>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
> Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 17:12:45 +0300
> > 
> > But the version of djgpp.env that users have on their machines, which 
> > comes from djdev203.zip, does specify CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH, and it points 
> > to lang/cxx, not lang/cxx-v3.  Won't this break C++ programs, especially 
> > if the users don't remove previous installation?
> 
> No it shouldn't do any harm. 
> 
> '[cpp]' section in djgpp.env is stale anyway gcc since gcc-2.95.3 uses 
> cpp0 instead of cpp (gcc-3.0 uses cpp0 only in some cases, eg. when 
> dumping preprocessed source is required)

Hm.. so you are saying that the "%DJDIR%/lang/cxx-v3" string is
hard-wired into cc1plus?