Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 11:33:30 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Message-Id: <200107010833.LAA21433@is.elta.co.il>
To: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
CC: broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.A41.4.05.10106291532350.42356-100000@ieva06.lanet.lv>
	(message from Andris Pavenis on Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:41:25 +0300 (WET))
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 released
References:  <Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 10106291532350 DOT 42356-100000 AT ieva06 DOT lanet DOT lv>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:41:25 +0300 (WET)
> From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
> 
> ftp://ftp.delorie.com/incoming is not world readable. So currently
> nobody except me can test these binaries which caused so much
> discussions. So please go to
> 
> 	http://www.ltn.lv/~pavenis/gcctest.html

Btw, I'd suggest to call the zip files gcc300b.zip etc., or maybe even
gcc3000b.zip, not gcc30b.zip.  Past experience suggests that people
get confused what file is newer when they see gcc30b.zip and
gcc2953b.zip.