Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 09:19:40 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
Message-Id: <8011-Sat30Jun2001091940+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3B3CAA63.25913.163A421@localhost> (snowball3@bigfoot.com)
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 released
References: <3B3C5EDA DOT 24973 DOT 3C891E AT localhost> (snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com) <3B3CAA63 DOT 25913 DOT 163A421 AT localhost>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 16:18:43 -0400
> 
> > Sure, but then what's the value of using the built-in script?
> 
> It's there in case it can't one in its linker script path.

To clarify: I'm not against having the built-in script.  When I asked
``what's the value'', I meant the value for solving the issue at hand,
not the value of having the script in the linker in general.