From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 22:26:19 +0200
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: bash 2.04 build failure?
Message-ID: <20010627222619.A204@lauras.lt>
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <3B3890D8 DOT 12023 DOT 1A6E91 AT localhost> <3B39F5BF DOT 260 DOT BC98FD AT localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3B39F5BF.260.BC98FD@localhost>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Setting PATH_SEPARATOR=: before running 'make check' is one fix. But then the
> next I find is the scripts all assume '/tmp' as the temporary directory.

After creation of c:/tmp, ``make check PATH_SEPARATOR=:'' gives this one:

c:\djgpp\tmp/dj900000: c:/djgpp/gnu/bash-2.05/djbuild/tests: is a directory
make.exe: *** [check] Error 126

> I don't use emacs so I can't answer #2.

OK, here is another one. Imagine we have following x.bat and x in the path,
and bash 2.04 as sh204, bash 2.05 as sh205:

cat c:/djgpp/bin/x.bat
@echo Executing batch file...

cat c:/djgpp/bin/x
#!/bin/sh
echo Executing shell script...
 
sh204 x
Executing shell script...

sh205 x
Executing batch file...

I really do not understand this. Maybe I'm tired, doing something
very stupid or what... Maybe environment is screwed up?.. I'm puzzled.

Laurynas