Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 12:40:04 -0400
Message-Id: <200106261640.MAA08088@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <9003-Tue26Jun2001174339+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 released
References: <Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 10106251924240 DOT 34030-100000 AT ieva06 DOT lanet DOT lv> <9003-Mon25Jun2001214631+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <200106251854 DOT OAA29303 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <9743-Mon25Jun2001224912+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <200106251955 DOT PAA29910 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <9003-Tue26Jun2001174339+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Sorry, I'm confused: what does ``custom djl file'' mean?  Are you
> talking about the solution suggested by Andris, that is, to put a
> linker script under lib/gcc-lib/, or something else?  If the latter,
> where will that file live, and what will be its name?

This is what I have:

$ unzip -l gcc30b.zip | grep djl
     1312  06-22-01 13:01   lib/gcc-lib/djgpp/3.0/djgpp-x.djl


> In general, I'd like to avoid to have two or more linker script in
> different places.  We've had this with specs before, and I'm still
> healing the wounds ;-)

I agree, but we can't seem to agree on a way of doing that that solves
those types of problems in every case.  We can still work towards that
solution, but I'd like to get something released last week.