Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:19:48 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 released
In-Reply-To: <3B376547.14699.24583@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010626161932.17201L-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Mark E. wrote:

> > That doesn't really answer my question.  Is ignoring these section a
> > clean solution or not?
> 
> Yes it is.

Then I have nothing against it.  Andris, please go ahead and post the
diffs.