Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 22:49:12 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT ZAHAV DOT NET DOT IL To: DJ Delorie Message-Id: <9743-Mon25Jun2001224912+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <200106251854.OAA29303@envy.delorie.com> (message from DJ Delorie on Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:54:52 -0400) Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 released References: <9003-Mon25Jun2001214631+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <200106251854 DOT OAA29303 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:54:52 -0400 > From: DJ Delorie > > > We are reiterating the same things for the umpteenth time. I don't > > see any point to continue monopolizing everybody's time, especially > > since you've already made up your mind and uploaded the distribution > > to DJ's machine. > > I am holding the zips until we resolve this issue, and I can make any > needed changes here pretty easily. I've seen no clear answer to the > question, though. That's the problem: everybody's holding to their positions. It would be best to avoid the problems that require changes in the linker script in the first place. One possibility that was not considered in this thread would be to reconfigure GCC so that the features which cause programs to crash are not used at all. But I'd hate to regress to such solutions, since I assume those are valuable features.