From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
To: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 18:00:56 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 released
Message-ID: <3B377C58.7429.141336@localhost>
In-reply-to: <3B331643.10237.B57C9@localhost>
References: <993214856 DOT 8796 DOT 0 DOT camel AT bender DOT falconsoft DOT be>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 22 Jun 2001, at 9:56, Mark E. wrote:

> > Isn't it about time we just dropped djgpp.djl altogether?
> > binutils has a perfectly fine linker script for djgpp built-in; so
> > couldn't we just require a recent binutils and be done with it?
> 
> As a step in this direction, I could include the up-to-date lib/djgpp.djl in 
> the bnu2112b.zip archive.

Perhaps it's better to fix linker scripts in lib/ldscripts if we are going to 
get rid of lib/djgpp.djl with time and not to supply lib/djgpp.djl with
binutils. 

Andris