From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 12:46:13 +0200
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 released
Message-ID: <20010623124613.B333@lauras.lt>
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <3B334F21 DOT 5415 DOT EB76DE AT localhost> <3B3390C0 DOT 14539 DOT AB3453 AT localhost> <20010622183424 DOT A19262 AT lauras DOT lt> <3B337B1C DOT 4090402 AT lanet DOT lv> <20010622182312 DOT 4070 DOT qmail AT softhome DOT net> <2593-Sat23Jun2001111133+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2593-Sat23Jun2001111133+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> > In another mail you've said that GCC 3.0.1 will be released shortly.
> > FYI, everybody not on GCC mailing list - it should happen on 2001.08.01.
> 
> Do you know whether the problems which require changes in the linker
> script are planned to be fixed there?

AFAIK, they are not problems; they are features. So future versions
of GCC will have to use the same script.

Laurynas