Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 11:14:03 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
Message-Id: <2950-Sat23Jun2001111402+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3B337B1C.4090402@lanet.lv> (message from Andris Pavenis on Fri,
	22 Jun 2001 20:06:36 +0300)
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 released
References: <3B334F21 DOT 5415 DOT EB76DE AT localhost> <3B3390C0 DOT 14539 DOT AB3453 AT localhost> <20010622183424 DOT A19262 AT lauras DOT lt> <3B337B1C DOT 4090402 AT lanet DOT lv>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:06:36 +0300
> From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
> > 
> > If you and Eli provide updated djgpp.djl in both packages, then this
> > will not happen. I really do not understand your concerns about updating
> > djdev203.zip.
> 
> Many of poeple who will download gcc-3.0 will not read carefully 
> instructions. It sad of course but it is so. So many can miss note
> that they should update djdev203.zip.

If GCC unzips djgpp.djl into %DJDIR%/lib, it will overwrite the old
script, so users don't need to read the instructions to get this part
right.  All they need is to answer YES when the unzip program asks
them whether to overwrite the file.  A small nuisance, but if they
want the latest and the greatest compiler, they will no doubt live
with that.