From: lauras AT softhome DOT net
Message-ID: <20010622182312.4070.qmail@softhome.net>
References: <3B334F21 DOT 5415 DOT EB76DE AT localhost>
            <3B3390C0 DOT 14539 DOT AB3453 AT localhost>
            <20010622183424 DOT A19262 AT lauras DOT lt>
            <3B337B1C DOT 4090402 AT lanet DOT lv>
In-Reply-To: <3B337B1C.4090402@lanet.lv>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 released
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:23:12 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sender: lauras AT softhome DOT net
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com


> Many of poeple who will download gcc-3.0 will not read carefully 
> instructions. It sad of course but it is so. So many can miss note
> that they should update djdev203.zip. If I'll provide linker script with
> GCC, we'll avoid related trouble as it's sure GCC will use correct 
> linker script (it will simply not look for lib/djgpp.djl at all)

We must have been talking about different solutions - as I see it, both
updated djdev203.zip and new gcc30b.zip should provide the updated 
lib/djgpp.djl at the same location. This way it doesn't matter which file
overwrites the other one. Does it sound better now?

In another mail you've said that GCC 3.0.1 will be released shortly.
FYI, everybody not on GCC mailing list - it should happen on 2001.08.01.

Laurynas