Message-ID: <3B337B1C.4090402@lanet.lv> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:06:36 +0300 From: Andris Pavenis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.5-ac13 i686; en-US; rv:0.9) Gecko/20010522 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 released References: <3B334F21 DOT 5415 DOT EB76DE AT localhost> <3B3390C0 DOT 14539 DOT AB3453 AT localhost> <20010622183424 DOT A19262 AT lauras DOT lt> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Laurynas Biveinis wrote: >>This really requires fixing only one package (GCC). Fixing djgpp.djl in >>djdev203.zip simultanously requires fixing 2 packages and there will >>be poeple who will get gcc-3.0 only and will cause possiblilty to mess >>things up. >> > > If you and Eli provide updated djgpp.djl in both packages, then this > will not happen. I really do not understand your concerns about updating > djdev203.zip. > Many of poeple who will download gcc-3.0 will not read carefully instructions. It sad of course but it is so. So many can miss note that they should update djdev203.zip. If I'll provide linker script with GCC, we'll avoid related trouble as it's sure GCC will use correct linker script (it will simply not look for lib/djgpp.djl at all) Andris