From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:34:24 +0200
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 released
Message-ID: <20010622183424.A19262@lauras.lt>
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com,
	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
References: <3B334F21 DOT 5415 DOT EB76DE AT localhost> <3B3390C0 DOT 14539 DOT AB3453 AT localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3B3390C0.14539.AB3453@localhost>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> This really requires fixing only one package (GCC). Fixing djgpp.djl in
> djdev203.zip simultanously requires fixing 2 packages and there will
> be poeple who will get gcc-3.0 only and will cause possiblilty to mess 
> things up. 

If you and Eli provide updated djgpp.djl in both packages, then this
will not happen. I really do not understand your concerns about updating
djdev203.zip.

Laurynas