Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:02:30 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: Tim Van Holder <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
Message-Id: <9003-Fri22Jun2001190230+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <993214856.8796.0.camel@bender.falconsoft.be> (message from Tim
	Van Holder on 22 Jun 2001 15:00:55 +0200)
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 released
	<Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 10106220819220 DOT 51584-100000 AT ieva06 DOT lanet DOT lv>	(message from
	Andris Pavenis on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:25:34 +0300 (WET))
	<3B334F21 DOT 5415 DOT EB76DE AT localhost> 
	<1858-Fri22Jun2001152251+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Tim Van Holder <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
> Date: 22 Jun 2001 15:00:55 +0200
> 
> Isn't it about time we just dropped djgpp.djl altogether?

We could consider that, but I don't see how is that different from
updating djdev203.zip.  In both cases, the linker script is not part
of the GCC distribution; in both cases, it's possible that a new GCC
version is released which requires changes in the linker script, which
is in a separate distro.

At least djdev203.zip is much smaller than Binutils, and so easier to
update and easier to download.