Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:22:51 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
Message-Id: <1858-Fri22Jun2001152251+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3B334F21.5415.EB76DE@localhost> (pavenis@lanet.lv)
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 released
References: <Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 10106220819220 DOT 51584-100000 AT ieva06 DOT lanet DOT lv>	(message from Andris Pavenis on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:25:34 +0300 (WET)) <3B334F21 DOT 5415 DOT EB76DE AT localhost>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:58:57 +0300
> 
> I'm sure having 2 incompatible files with the same name is 
> going to cause more problems rather than temporary changing the 
> name

I don't agree with this assessment of the relative dangers in the two
alternatives.

> What I suggesting is to temporary use linker script with a slightly 
> different name before djdev204.zip will be released

How is this different from uploading a fixed djdev203.zip now?