From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 19:22:05 +0200
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: bash 2.04 build failure?
Message-ID: <20010620192205.A21575@lauras.lt>
Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>,
	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <20010620113212 DOT A16882 AT lauras DOT lt> <3395-Wed20Jun2001200621+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3395-Wed20Jun2001200621+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> That's because dosexec.c in the library sources now has the code to
> support invocation of Windows programs with long command lines via
> CMDLINE environment variable.  This change required an addition of
> another argument to _dos_exec, so now the prototype in process.h and
> in Bash disagree.
> 
> I guess Bash should incorporate the code which supports CMDLINE.
> Unless this is done, you can't build Bash with CVS libc, because
> library functions which call _dos_exec will crash due to mismatch in
> the argument list.

Thanks, I guess I will have to try to fix bash. I have to see it working
with WIP libc.

Laurynas