Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:07:54 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: Richard Dawe Message-Id: <1190-Wed20Jun2001100754+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <3B2FAA2B.9A052A08@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard Dawe on Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:38:19 +0100) Subject: Re: djgpp: djgpp/src/docs/kb/wc204.txi References: <3B2FAA2B DOT 9A052A08 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:38:19 +0100 > From: Richard Dawe > > bash-2.04$ grep '@findex' wc204.txi | grep '\.c' > @findex spawn*@r{, invoking @file{.com} programs} > @findex fdopen DOT c AT r{, no longer uses _IOAPPEND flag} > @findex fflush DOT c AT r{, no longer uses _IOAPPEND flag} > @findex flsbuf DOT c AT r{, no longer uses _IOAPPEND flag} > @findex fopen DOT c AT r{, no longer uses _IOAPPEND flag} > @findex freopen DOT c AT r{, no longer uses _IOAPPEND flag} > > Wouldn't these be better off in the concept index or actually listed as > functions? Yes, they should be functions (fdopen instead of fdopen.c, etc.).