Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID: <3B2FAA2B.9A052A08@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:38:19 +0100
From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: djgpp: djgpp/src/docs/kb/wc204.txi
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010619115802 DOT 7390P-100000 AT is>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Richard Dawe wrote:
>
> > Namely: stdarg.h, varargs.h, libc/dosio.h, libc/file.h. If no-one
> > objects, I'll fix those too tomorrow.
> 
> Yes, please.  Thanks for catching that.

OK, committed.

BTW there seem to be some files listed in the function index:

bash-2.04$ grep '@findex' wc204.txi  | grep '\.c'
@findex spawn*@r{, invoking @file{.com} programs}
@findex fdopen DOT c AT r{, no longer uses _IOAPPEND flag}
@findex fflush DOT c AT r{, no longer uses _IOAPPEND flag}
@findex flsbuf DOT c AT r{, no longer uses _IOAPPEND flag}
@findex fopen DOT c AT r{, no longer uses _IOAPPEND flag}
@findex freopen DOT c AT r{, no longer uses _IOAPPEND flag}

Wouldn't these be better off in the concept index or actually listed as
functions?

Thanks, bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe
http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/