From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:05:01 +0200
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc-3.0
Message-ID: <20010619200501.A203@lauras.lt>
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <3B2F9C93 DOT 15611 DOT D557DF AT localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3B2F9C93.15611.D557DF@localhost>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> scripts I used and diffs against original gcc-3.0.tar.gz
> 	http://www.ltn.lv/~pavenis/gcc30s2.zip

Thanks, and just two minor comments:

1) Patch to djgpp.h - you've made it to abort if -fPIC given. IMHO
this might be a wrong solution, if there are some packages which
assume that -fPIC is supposed to work.

2) Patch to t-djgpp - this patch would make GCC maintainers angry. Very
angry indeed - they are working to get rid of most x-*, xm-*.h, t-* files.
Any other possible solutions there? It's OK with our release, but I'm
thinking about upstream.

And thanks again :)

Laurynas