Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:59:09 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Tim Van Holder <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Subject: Re: Package of libtool?
In-Reply-To: <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIKEHECEAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010619115840.7390Q-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Tim Van Holder wrote:

> From my attempts at building cvs gettext (which now uses 1.4) there should
> be no problem, save one.  ltconfig uses -fPIC as compiler option to
> produce PIC code.  gcc happily accepts this option and generates assembler
> code our as can't grok (bfd assertions get thrown).

libtool used not to do that with DJGPP (IIRC, the -fPIC test was
present in libtool for quite some time).  What changed?