Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID: <3B2CE723.308D35D2@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 18:21:39 +0100
From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Update for symlinks and LS_COLORS
References: <3B2B6B87 DOT 36D691DD AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <7704-Sat16Jun2001175813+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3B2B838E DOT 50C181B0 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <9791-Sat16Jun2001231435+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Yes, it's much better.  I think this can go in, as it doesn't do any
> harm with the stock Fileutils binaries which don't support symlinks.

Yes, it should not affect Fileutils 3.16 either.

> I have two small requests, though: (1) could you tell what colors will
> be used by the new entries you added?

Sure: it sets normal symlinks to bright cyan and orphaned symlinks to red.
The normal symlinks are similar in colour but brighter than directories,
so they should be easy to distinguish.

> and (2) please put a short note about this change into wc204.txi.

Yep, done.

I've committed the patch with wc204 entry.

Thanks, bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe
http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/