Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 23:14:35 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: Richard Dawe Message-Id: <9791-Sat16Jun2001231435+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <3B2B838E.50C181B0@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard Dawe on Sat, 16 Jun 2001 17:04:30 +0100) Subject: Re: Update for symlinks and LS_COLORS References: <3B2B6B87 DOT 36D691DD AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <7704-Sat16Jun2001175813+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3B2B838E DOT 50C181B0 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 17:04:30 +0100 > From: Richard Dawe > > > > > > OK to commit? > > > > Something's wrong with these diffs: Patch rejects it. And I cannot > > blame it: look at the patch and you will see that both the `old' and > > `new' parts add lines(??). > > It looks like my mail software wrapped the lines - the changed lines > should start with a '!'. The next non-whitespace character is '+', hence > the confusion, if it wraps onto a new line. > > I've attached the diff this time. Hope that's better. Yes, it's much better. I think this can go in, as it doesn't do any harm with the stock Fileutils binaries which don't support symlinks. I have two small requests, though: (1) could you tell what colors will be used by the new entries you added? and (2) please put a short note about this change into wc204.txi. Thanks!