Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 12:57:22 -0600
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: fsdb and .exe files from djasm
Message-ID: <20010613125722.A29631@taniwha.org>
Mail-Followup-To: bill, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010613105558.A25987@kendall.sfbr.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
From: Bill Currie <bill AT taniwha DOT org>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:55:58AM -0500, JT Williams wrote:
> -: fsdb is a 32-bit p-mode debugger and djasm produces 16-bit r-mode
> -: code.  Do you really expect this to work?
> 
> You are correct; I knew this once, but needed to be reminded.
> Thanks.
> 
> (Actually, it would be enough if DOS `debug' were smart enough to
> disassemble 386 instructions, display extended register contents, etc.)

Opendos' (er, what's it called these days?) debug groks 386 instructions,
maybe even pentium (I can't remmeber), and can be made to display the extended
regs using (eg) r eax (and then don't modify it).

Bill
-- 
Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak