Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:50:11 -0400
Message-Id: <200106131850.OAA03076@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIEEDGCEAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
Subject: Re: More POSIX.200x compliance
References:  <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIEEDGCEAA DOT tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Should a detailed change log for each function be listed in wc204,
> or is it enough to simply list them saying that several functions
> were changed slightly to comply with the new POSIX standard?

There should at least be a list of functions, such as:

foo, bar, grill: Slight changes to comply with POSIX.42
@findex foo
@findex bar
@findex grill

But it isn't necessary to have a separate entry for each function.