Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 10:10:08 -0400
Message-Id: <200106131410.KAA00655@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
In-reply-to: <3b27b278.56c.0@NewMail.Net> (alexbodn@NewMail.Net)
Subject: Re: 
References:  <3b27b278 DOT 56c DOT 0 AT NewMail DOT Net>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


I have no problem with this type of change.  Your patch, however, was
word-wrapped by your mailer and is thus difficult to use.

You should #undef putc before trying to pass it as a function in
_doprnt.

Your diffs don't have paths in them.  Is there any way you could cause
the relative paths to be added?

I wonder if we should extend the FILE structure to include pointers to
filbuf and flsbuf functions?  That would cover a lot of ground pretty
quickly.