Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:53:23 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: dj AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <9743-Sun10Jun2001235322+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200106101936.PAA14115@envy.delorie.com> (message from DJ Delorie
	on Sun, 10 Jun 2001 15:36:27 -0400)
Subject: Re: confstr v2
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010610104032 DOT 5638B-100000 AT is> <200106101441 DOT KAA11909 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <9003-Sun10Jun2001200407+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <200106101936 DOT PAA14115 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 15:36:27 -0400
> From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
> 
> > If so, how about if the
> > original value of DJDIR is not stashed away by the startup code unless
> > confstr is linked in?
> 
> That's what a static constructor would do.

Yes, that's another possibility.