Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 23:21:14 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <5137-Sat09Jun2001232113+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200106091703.TAA04023@mother.ludd.luth.se> (message from Martin
	Str|mberg on Sat, 9 Jun 2001 19:03:43 +0200 (MEST))
Subject: Re: Compiler options for djdev build
References:  <200106091703 DOT TAA04023 AT mother DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
> Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 19:03:43 +0200 (MEST)
> 
> According to Eli Zaretskii:
> > 
> > > From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
> > > Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 11:35:57 +0200 (MEST)
> > > 
> > > Some more changes (some might already have been reported in my earlier
> > > mail; again hand pasted so might not apply cleanly):
> > 
> > These look good to me.
> 
> You did see that I was poking around in stdio.h I hope?

You mean, the change in declaration of the _bufsiz member in the FILE
object?  Yes, I saw that.  AFAICS, _bufsiz never gets any negative
value, so I think that change is okay.